Friday, January 5, 2007

Eragon

Over the Christmas break, I went and saw the movie Eragon with my brother and husband. I think the book is a good story. It's a fun adventure, there are dragons, elves, and magic, and evil things that need to be vanquished. When I have kids, I will read Paolini's trilogy to them.

But, I think the book as literature is extremely derivative. The plot of Eragon is essentially that of Star Wars, rewritten in a fantasy world instead of space. A princess who supports a rebel group who sends something vital to their cause to a distant land, where it's found by a young boy who is then mentored by a hermit. Sound familiar to anyone? Even the most basic concept of the book--Eragon and his fantastic connection to the dragon Saphira--is almost directly lifted from Anne McCaffery's Dragonriders of Pern series. A 2004 article in USA Today asks the question, "Could teenager Christopher Paolini be the next J.R.R. Tolkien?" If Paolini is to stand on the same level as Tolkien, he needs to come up with some of his own material, and lift less of it directly from authors he so obviously admires. At this point, comparisons between Paolini and Tolkien do nothing but insult Tolkien, who had the original ideas that Paolini blatantly copies, with little or no revision--Lothlorien, Helm's Deep, even the nature of elves. As my dad asked about Eragon, "Isn't he that guy from The Lord of the Rings?"

The movie reflects the problems of the book quite well. There are a lot of very grandiose shots of Brom and Eragon traveling across mountains and wide open fields. Seems like not only did Paolini take a lot of his content from Tolkien, but Eragon director Stefan Fangmeier also took a lesson or two from LOTR director Peter Jackson. But the plot and dialogue of the movie are lacking. Many elements from the book are eliminated, which leaves the plot even more scarce than it originally was. I did like the special-effects dragon, but it wasn't enough to make up for the lack of real content (not just landscape shots) and provocative dialogue.

Thus, both the book and movie Eragon have the same problem--they attempt to copy the style and epic nature of Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings--but because of a lack of substance and original dialogue, they come across as second rate imitations.

2 comments:

Nathan Ilten said...

Considering that LOTR is for a large part a ripoff of the Niebelungen saga, I think that your criticism is partially incorrect (but probably nevertheless justified). I imagine that the plot in the original star wars also wasn't all that new. What sets these movies/books apart is that they took a story and presented it in a new, exciting form that the public didn't know; I think that is where Lucas/Tolkien show their creative genius. Nobody wanted to sit through 3 days of opra/learn old German to hear the story of the Niebelungen, so Tolkien picked out the interesting bits and put them in a (somewhat) readable series of books.

The problem with Eragon (which I haven't seen, but I'm relying on your description) is that not only is the story not new, the presentation isn't either. Maybe a theme park ride...?

Teranu said...

Right...It's not that Tolkien wasn't basing his stuff on previous material, but that he made it his own in a way that Paolini doesn't.